<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look at Kayak Hull Designs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.austinkayak.com/2012/08/a-look-at-kayak-hull-designs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.austinkayak.com/2012/08/a-look-at-kayak-hull-designs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:41:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdowdy</title>
		<link>http://blog.austinkayak.com/2012/08/a-look-at-kayak-hull-designs/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>jdowdy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinkayak.com/blog/?p=14695#comment-985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rod, 

After reading your comment, I went ahead and reworded my explanation in the blog. Thanks for the feedback, glad you liked the article!

Joseph]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod, </p>
<p>After reading your comment, I went ahead and reworded my explanation in the blog. Thanks for the feedback, glad you liked the article!</p>
<p>Joseph</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://blog.austinkayak.com/2012/08/a-look-at-kayak-hull-designs/#comment-983</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 00:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.austinkayak.com/blog/?p=14695#comment-983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Joseph, you have really explained the basic consepts very well. Where the manufacturers trick us with some of their designs is when they use combinations of these concepts in different parts of the hull. I was particularly interested in your explaination of primary and secondary stability. I had always thought primary stability was stability in the upright position and secondary stability was the kayak had better stabilty when it was leaned on a side. I suppose the result is the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Joseph, you have really explained the basic consepts very well. Where the manufacturers trick us with some of their designs is when they use combinations of these concepts in different parts of the hull. I was particularly interested in your explaination of primary and secondary stability. I had always thought primary stability was stability in the upright position and secondary stability was the kayak had better stabilty when it was leaned on a side. I suppose the result is the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: cdn-wp.austinkayak.com

 Served from: blog.austinkayak.com @ 2013-06-19 19:06:59 by W3 Total Cache -->